KarenRei
02-04-2008, 10:47 AM
On my way to work today, we swerved at the last minute to avoid a huge, deep pool of standing water on the road, and I got to thinking, what if I had been in an Aptera and we'd gone into it? The prospect of batteries shorting through the water with water entering the passenger compartment is a definitely Not Good(TM) situation. Sure, lead-acid batteries short in cars when they flood, but there's a *lot* less current flowing than we'd have here. Here are some potential ways to ameliorate the problem.
1) Drive wheel
The first part of the vehicle to have the potential for a short, just from my mental image of the layout of the internals of the vehicle, would be the rear drive motor. It's not in-wheel, which buys you some height, perhaps a foot, foot and a half. There's a rather simple solution for this one: a circuit breaker or fuse closer to the batteries.
2) Batteries and ultracapacitors
This one seems a bit trickier. You can't just put a fuse on the batteries because the short is between the terminal. But there still are a few potential solutions. I'll refer to batteries and ultracapacitors interchangeably here.
2a) Internal fuses: The batteries could be waterproof-sealed with internal fuse. This, however, would be a design issue up to the battery manufacturer.
2b) Sealed battery compartment with internal fuse: This would be something Aptera could do on their own -- to have the entire battery pack enclosed in vaccuum-sealed plastic with a fuse between the exterior terminals and the batteries.
2c) Fuses/breakers between batteries in parallel: To get more voltage, many batteries are undoubtedly wired in parallel in places. Breaking the circuit here wouldn't stop them from shorting, but would lower the voltage in the water, making it more likely to take a "direct" route across the terminals and thus having less current travelling through the water at greater distances.
3) Passenger compartment:
3a) Insulative firewall without holes: There's usually a firewall between the batteries and the passenger compartment. If it had a high dielectric constant, that'd make it a longer route for the current shorting through the water to reach the inside of the passenger compartment. How rapidly current drops off in water should be relative to the voltage and the distance, so anything that decreases the voltage or, in this case, increases the distance, is a good thing.
3b) Watertight or water-resistant doors: Having the vehicle be able to float would, on its own, be a good thing.
I think the ideal situation would be internal fuses on the batteries and fuses/breakers for all other electric components that have the potential to carry significant current, such as the drive wheels. Given this, I don't think there'd be a real problem with being shorted in the water, although I'd be more comfortable if tests were done.
1) Drive wheel
The first part of the vehicle to have the potential for a short, just from my mental image of the layout of the internals of the vehicle, would be the rear drive motor. It's not in-wheel, which buys you some height, perhaps a foot, foot and a half. There's a rather simple solution for this one: a circuit breaker or fuse closer to the batteries.
2) Batteries and ultracapacitors
This one seems a bit trickier. You can't just put a fuse on the batteries because the short is between the terminal. But there still are a few potential solutions. I'll refer to batteries and ultracapacitors interchangeably here.
2a) Internal fuses: The batteries could be waterproof-sealed with internal fuse. This, however, would be a design issue up to the battery manufacturer.
2b) Sealed battery compartment with internal fuse: This would be something Aptera could do on their own -- to have the entire battery pack enclosed in vaccuum-sealed plastic with a fuse between the exterior terminals and the batteries.
2c) Fuses/breakers between batteries in parallel: To get more voltage, many batteries are undoubtedly wired in parallel in places. Breaking the circuit here wouldn't stop them from shorting, but would lower the voltage in the water, making it more likely to take a "direct" route across the terminals and thus having less current travelling through the water at greater distances.
3) Passenger compartment:
3a) Insulative firewall without holes: There's usually a firewall between the batteries and the passenger compartment. If it had a high dielectric constant, that'd make it a longer route for the current shorting through the water to reach the inside of the passenger compartment. How rapidly current drops off in water should be relative to the voltage and the distance, so anything that decreases the voltage or, in this case, increases the distance, is a good thing.
3b) Watertight or water-resistant doors: Having the vehicle be able to float would, on its own, be a good thing.
I think the ideal situation would be internal fuses on the batteries and fuses/breakers for all other electric components that have the potential to carry significant current, such as the drive wheels. Given this, I don't think there'd be a real problem with being shorted in the water, although I'd be more comfortable if tests were done.