palmer_md
12-09-2009, 12:15 PM
I've known for some time about the upcoming standard that they are trying to adopt (the yazaki plug) SAE J1772. I came across this page where a guy from the UK is suggesting another plug developed by Mennekes with Daimler. This plug has a slightly lower rating for the US (63 amp instead of 70 amp) but has an equal rating for the EU where 3 phase power is more common.
This brings up the question of the standard. The standard should be global not just US based. Are we going to end up with two standards?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IEC 62196
Therefore, Europe has recently come up with an alternative. Why not just use the existing IEC 60309? Well, there are a few drawbacks - the higher current versions are rather bulky and there's no provision for a pilot or data pin (to allow the cable to be de-energised when not plugged into a vehicle). As well, it would be an advantage to offer various different supplies such as 1 or 3 phase, and different current levels all through the same connector. This wouldn't be legal with the IEC60309 standard, and there are many existing devices using those connectors which expect the correct supply to be present at every socket.
The new connector is made by Mennekes. This was developed with requirements from RWE and Daimler, and was revealed only recently (a press release is on the RWE Mobility website). The connectors will be referenced under the IEC 62196 electric vehicle charging standard.
It looks pretty similar to the SAE connector - but it has 7 contacts in total, 3 AC phases and Neutral, with a 63A rating - giving an amazing 43kW maximum charge rate. If the car had a charger capable of using the full current (perhaps using the AC motor controller "in reverse"), this could be worth up to 200 miles of charge per hour!
It appears very compact for the power, compared to the IEC60309 type, and is not overcomplicated. The developers explain that the same connector could be used on both ends of the charging cable, and there is a locking mechanism to make charging secure.
But these connectors clearly overlap in purpose, so why not settle on just one? The European developers apparently have this in mind, since it's also possible to use the pins of the IEC connector for the USA single-phase application, but not the other way around..
Will the USA adopt it, or will "not invented here" syndrome be the deciding factor? We will find out soon!
http://www.tuer.co.uk/charge-connectors.htm
This brings up the question of the standard. The standard should be global not just US based. Are we going to end up with two standards?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IEC 62196
Therefore, Europe has recently come up with an alternative. Why not just use the existing IEC 60309? Well, there are a few drawbacks - the higher current versions are rather bulky and there's no provision for a pilot or data pin (to allow the cable to be de-energised when not plugged into a vehicle). As well, it would be an advantage to offer various different supplies such as 1 or 3 phase, and different current levels all through the same connector. This wouldn't be legal with the IEC60309 standard, and there are many existing devices using those connectors which expect the correct supply to be present at every socket.
The new connector is made by Mennekes. This was developed with requirements from RWE and Daimler, and was revealed only recently (a press release is on the RWE Mobility website). The connectors will be referenced under the IEC 62196 electric vehicle charging standard.
It looks pretty similar to the SAE connector - but it has 7 contacts in total, 3 AC phases and Neutral, with a 63A rating - giving an amazing 43kW maximum charge rate. If the car had a charger capable of using the full current (perhaps using the AC motor controller "in reverse"), this could be worth up to 200 miles of charge per hour!
It appears very compact for the power, compared to the IEC60309 type, and is not overcomplicated. The developers explain that the same connector could be used on both ends of the charging cable, and there is a locking mechanism to make charging secure.
But these connectors clearly overlap in purpose, so why not settle on just one? The European developers apparently have this in mind, since it's also possible to use the pins of the IEC connector for the USA single-phase application, but not the other way around..
Will the USA adopt it, or will "not invented here" syndrome be the deciding factor? We will find out soon!
http://www.tuer.co.uk/charge-connectors.htm