PDA

View Full Version : "Why we prefer founding CEOs" - bhorowitz.com


futura
05-06-2010, 11:35 AM
From Steve's Twitter: " Interesting article on founding CEO's" http://bhorowitz.com/2010/04/28/why-we-prefer-founding-ceos/

Nothing earth shattering. Just thought it was interesting that two of Steve's recent posts were on this topic and: "Why you should never listen to the customer (http://blogmaverick.com/2010/04/06/why-you-should-never-listen-to-your-customers/)"

The technology business is fundamentally the innovation business. Etymologically, the word technology means “a better way of doing things.” As a result, innovation is the core competency for technology companies. Technology companies are born because they create a better way of doing things. Eventually, someone else will come up with a better way. Therefore, if a technology company ceases to innovate, it will die.

These innovations are product cycles. Professional CEOs are effective at maximizing, but not finding, product cycles. Conversely, founding CEOs are excellent at finding, but not maximizing, product cycles. Our experience shows—and the data supports—that teaching a founding CEO how to maximize the product cycle is easier than teaching the professional CEO how to find the new product cycle.

The reason is that innovation is the most difficult core competency to build in any business. Innovation is almost insane by definition: most people view any truly innovative idea as stupid, because if it was a good idea, somebody would have already done it. So, the innovator is guaranteed to have more natural initial detractors than followers.

Grendal
05-06-2010, 01:07 PM
Aptera is a very good example of this. We will never know for certain whether Steve Fambro would have done a better job at CEO than PW but he certainly achieved a lot more during his time running the company than PW did. Steves achievements have been listed on the forum in the past and PW failures (and achievements) have been analysed as well. The fundamental job of the CEO is to juggle the realities of all the corporate pieces and move them forward toward the goal of reaching production. Steve would not have had as many connections in the automotive world as PW but you can always hire a consultant to do that.

palmer_md
05-06-2010, 01:35 PM
Just thought it was interesting that two of Steve's recent posts were on this topic and: "Why you should never listen to the customer (http://blogmaverick.com/2010/04/06/why-you-should-never-listen-to-your-customers/)"

Maybe he is campaigning for the job back. If I were the board, I would seriously consider removing Paul and re-instating Steve. It would be very expensive as we would be going back to square one and starting over, but it looks like its going nowhere now, so there really is nothing to loose. I think Paul has just a few months to prove this new car works during the Xprize competition. If this car does not perform as well as the old car we may see a re-setting of the clocks. If the new car gets tuned properly and seems to go through the Xprize without any real issues, then I think we will see Paul stay and continue to build the company. I don't think anybody at Aptera is going to be getting a full nights sleep for the next few months. They will be working furiously to get this SO-1 to work flawlessly.

iwannaptera
05-06-2010, 08:02 PM
Maybe he is campaigning for the job back. If I were the board, I would seriously consider removing Paul and re-instating Steve. It would be very expensive as we would be going back to square one and starting over, ...

I really don't understand that logic. Is Steve such an immature child that they can't see the good and the bad of the SO-1? Would he really have to (again) start ALL over? I just can't believe that.

aptera1213
05-06-2010, 08:27 PM
Wow...I don't think Steve has commented in this thread. And to be attacked? Strange.

As far as we know Steve is doing his own thing.

As for seeing the good and bad...who knows. But shouldn't the "bad" be fixed?
Or is bad ok in start up cars now?

Gavin

iwannaptera
05-06-2010, 08:32 PM
What attack? I just said steve is unlikely to be such an immature child that he would have to throw out everything about the so-1 and start COMPLETELY over. Why are you manufacturing drama?

Additionally, I never implied that one should not fix the "bad." Stop putting words in my mouth.

aptera1213
05-06-2010, 09:05 PM
Ah....thanks...I misunderstood. I thought you WERE calling him that.

Sorry...

Gavin

aptera1213
05-06-2010, 09:08 PM
Ps...not "manufacturing" drama...re-read you post...it is easy to see it as an unprovoked attack...

I didn't read it as " I don't think steve is a child" as much as "is steve a child?" largely because that is how you worded it.

aptera1213
05-06-2010, 09:18 PM
Now as for what he might do...now that is interesting...I don't think he would start over...but I imagine he would redo the wheelpants and likely redo the doors...go back to split windows, enlarge the side window back to the old style and redo the hinges and locks. Maybe adjust the nose too.

Other than that, probably not too much to change. Maybe readjust the quarter panel windows and maybe the rear hatch to weigh less

Gavin

evmavin
05-06-2010, 10:46 PM
Put hidden cameras in the break room?